For homeopathy colleges

HomeopathyWorld lets a class practise case-taking against an AI patient, repertorise what they find in a real repertory, prescribe, and get a structured critique — with their teacher able to set the work, watch it and sign off every score.

It is free for colleges. There is nothing to install: students use it in a browser on a phone or a laptop.

What a class gives you

• Assign a case with a deadline. Pick a case, set when it opens and when it is due, and add a note for the class.
• Or set a timed OSCE station. The clock runs on the server and cannot be paused; there are no hints, no coverage meter and no remedy ranking, and each student gets one attempt. Asking the patient to break role or name a remedy is recorded as a process error.
• Sign off, or change, every score. The AI’s score is advisory until a faculty member confirms it. You can override it, and you give a reason when you do. A student can dispute a score, and you answer.
• See the class at a glance — who has attempted what, and how each attempt went.

What your students do

A student interviews a simulated patient in their own words — the patient answers in character and will not tell them the remedy. They pick rubrics from the real repertory as they go, repertorise them, prescribe with a potency, and write their reasoning. They are then scored on the case-taking itself, not only the final remedy, and get a debrief naming what they never asked and why it mattered.

Cases can be taken in several Indian languages, and spoken aloud rather than typed.

What you can and cannot see

A faculty member sees the cases a student does for that class’s assignments — the conversation, the rubrics they chose, the prescription, their self-rating and the scores. Nothing else: not their private practice cases, not their patient records, not their other classes. Students are told this before they join, and leaving the class ends that access.

We do not claim that nobody else can reach the data: a system administrator can reach the database, and we say so plainly. What we can and cannot see sets that out in full, including what is enforced in the database rather than merely promised.

What sits behind it

The reference content is real and its sources are named, because this matters in a teaching setting:

• 71,457 rubrics from Kent’s Repertory of the Homeopathic Materia Medica (1897) and Bönninghausen’s Therapeutic Pocket-Book (T.F. Allen ed., 1891), with Bönninghausen’s four-degree grading preserved.
• Six classical Materia Medica texts — Boericke, Allen’s Keynotes, Boger, Kent, Tyler and Farrington — around 11,100 entries, searchable across all of them.
• All 291 aphorisms of the Organon, in the public-domain Boericke translation.

Everything above is public domain and used under that status, with attribution. Copyrighted repertories are deliberately not included. The AI-drafted commentary on the Organon is marked as such and is pending homeopath review — it is study material, not an authority.

Being straight with you about the stage

This is a young platform and you would be among the first colleges on it. That has an obvious downside and one real upside: what you ask for gets built, and you will be talking to the person who builds it rather than a support queue. If that is not what you want from a teaching tool right now, that is an entirely reasonable answer.

How to start

1. Email drharishkumar30@gmail.com with your college and the class you teach.
2. We create the class and name you as its faculty. You get an eight-character code.
3. Read the code out to your students. They register, enter it on their Cases page, and they are in. Then assign your first case.

A class of sixty takes about ten minutes to set up, and costs nothing. If you would rather see it first, make an account and try a case yourself — you do not need a class to do that.